2000 Acura NSX vs. 1962 Austin A 99

To start off, 2000 Acura NSX is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 3,208 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura NSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 99. (110 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Acura NSX weights approximately 45 kg more than 1962 Austin A 99. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Acura NSX (305 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 99. (221 Nm). This means 2000 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 99.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Acura NSX 1962 Austin A 99
Make Acura Austin
Model NSX A 99
Year Released 2000 1962
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 3208 cc 2912 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 223 HP 110 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 4750 RPM
Torque 305 Nm 221 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 1 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1575 kg 1530 kg
Vehicle Length 4430 mm 4950 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1180 mm 1540 mm
Wheelbase Size 2540 mm 2800 mm