2000 Acura NSX vs. 1963 ZAZ Jalta
To start off, 2000 Acura NSX is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 ZAZ Jalta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 ZAZ Jalta would be higher. At 3,208 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura NSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 1963 ZAZ Jalta. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1963 ZAZ Jalta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Acura NSX weights approximately 939 kg more than 1963 ZAZ Jalta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Acura NSX (305 Nm) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 ZAZ Jalta. (52 Nm). This means 2000 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 ZAZ Jalta.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Acura NSX | 1963 ZAZ Jalta | |
Make | Acura | ZAZ |
Model | NSX | Jalta |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Middle | Rear |
Engine Size | 3208 cc | 887 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 52 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 636 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2030 mm |