2000 Acura NSX vs. 1964 Austin Princess

To start off, 2000 Acura NSX is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura NSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1964 Austin Princess. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin Princess weights approximately 605 kg more than 2000 Acura NSX.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Acura NSX (305 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin Princess. (251 Nm). This means 2000 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin Princess.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Acura NSX 1964 Austin Princess
Make Acura Austin
Model NSX Princess
Year Released 2000 1964
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 3208 cc 3993 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 223 HP 119 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 305 Nm 251 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1575 kg 2180 kg
Vehicle Length 4430 mm 5470 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1900 mm
Vehicle Height 1180 mm 1780 mm
Wheelbase Size 2540 mm 3360 mm