2000 Acura NSX vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2000 Acura NSX is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura NSX (276 HP @ 7300 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 570 kg more than 2000 Acura NSX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Acura NSX | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Acura | Cadillac |
| Model | NSX | 62 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3178 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 2030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 75 L |
