2000 Acura NSX vs. 1967 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2000 Acura NSX is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura NSX (480 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 454 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Acura NSX weights approximately 915 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Acura NSX | 1967 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Acura | DAF |
Model | NSX | Daffodil |
Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 745 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 480 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2060 mm |