2000 Acura NSX vs. 1967 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2000 Acura NSX is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura NSX (480 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 391 more horse power than 1967 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1967 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Acura NSX weights approximately 405 kg more than 1967 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Acura NSX (542 Nm) has 384 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 2000 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Acura NSX | 1967 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Acura | Triumph |
| Model | NSX | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 480 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 542 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2700 mm |
