2000 Acura NSX vs. 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 Acura NSX is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,178 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Acura NSX weights approximately 140 kg more than 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2000 Acura NSX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Acura NSX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Acura NSX | 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Acura | Oldsmobile |
Model | NSX | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2000 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3178 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2680 mm |