2000 Acura NSX vs. 1986 Citroen Aventure
To start off, 2000 Acura NSX is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Citroen Aventure. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Citroen Aventure would be higher. At 3,208 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura NSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1986 Citroen Aventure. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen Aventure.
Because 2000 Acura NSX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Acura NSX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Citroen Aventure, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Acura NSX (305 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen Aventure. (120 Nm). This means 2000 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen Aventure.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Acura NSX | 1986 Citroen Aventure | |
Make | Acura | Citroen |
Model | NSX | Aventure |
Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3208 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 120 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |