2000 Acura NSX vs. 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D
To start off, 2000 Acura NSX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura NSX (480 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 429 more horse power than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. (51 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Acura NSX weights approximately 705 kg more than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Acura NSX (542 Nm) has 453 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. (89 Nm). This means 2000 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Acura NSX | 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D | |
Make | Acura | Rover |
Model | NSX | 100 1.4 D |
Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1358 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 480 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 542 Nm | 89 Nm |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1380 mm |