2000 Acura NSX vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma
To start off, 2000 Acura NSX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura NSX (480 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 391 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. (89 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma.
Because 2000 Acura NSX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Acura NSX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Acura NSX (542 Nm) has 366 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. (176 Nm). This means 2000 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Acura NSX | 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma | |
Make | Acura | Mitsubishi |
Model | NSX | Carisma |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 480 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 542 Nm | 176 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1410 mm |