2000 Acura NSX vs. 1999 BMW M28i
To start off, 2000 Acura NSX is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW M28i. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW M28i would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura NSX (480 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 230 more horse power than 1999 BMW M28i. (250 HP @ 7400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1999 BMW M28i. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 BMW M28i weights approximately 125 kg more than 2000 Acura NSX.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Acura NSX (542 Nm) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 BMW M28i. (355 Nm). This means 2000 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 BMW M28i.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Acura NSX | 1999 BMW M28i | |
| Make | Acura | BMW |
| Model | NSX | M28i |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 3201 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 480 HP | 250 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7400 RPM |
| Torque | 542 Nm | 355 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1700 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2840 mm |
