2000 Acura NSX vs. 2005 Daewoo Rexton
To start off, 2005 Daewoo Rexton is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Acura NSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Acura NSX would be higher. At 3,208 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura NSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2005 Daewoo Rexton. (215 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 2005 Daewoo Rexton. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Daewoo Rexton weights approximately 375 kg more than 2000 Acura NSX.
Because 2005 Daewoo Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Acura NSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Daewoo Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Daewoo Rexton (318 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Acura NSX. (305 Nm). This means 2005 Daewoo Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Acura NSX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Acura NSX | 2005 Daewoo Rexton | |
| Make | Acura | Daewoo |
| Model | NSX | Rexton |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3208 cc | 3199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 215 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 318 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2830 mm |
