2000 Acura NSX vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Acura NSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Acura NSX would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura NSX (480 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 341 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 3. (139 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Acura NSX weights approximately 441 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Acura NSX (542 Nm) has 360 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (182 Nm). This means 2000 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Acura NSX | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Acura | Mazda |
Model | NSX | 3 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 480 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 542 Nm | 182 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2650 mm |