2000 Acura NSX vs. 2009 Honda FR-V
To start off, 2009 Honda FR-V is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Acura NSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Acura NSX would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura NSX (480 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 342 more horse power than 2009 Honda FR-V. (138 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 2009 Honda FR-V.
Because 2000 Acura NSX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Acura NSX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Honda FR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Acura NSX (542 Nm) has 368 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Honda FR-V. (174 Nm). This means 2000 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Honda FR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Acura NSX | 2009 Honda FR-V | |
Make | Acura | Honda |
Model | NSX | FR-V |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 480 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 542 Nm | 174 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2120 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2690 mm |