2000 Acura NSX vs. 2010 GMC Savana

To start off, 2010 GMC Savana is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Acura NSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Acura NSX would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 GMC Savana (323 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2000 Acura NSX. (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 GMC Savana should accelerate faster than 2000 Acura NSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 GMC Savana weights approximately 1098 kg more than 2000 Acura NSX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 GMC Savana (505 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Acura NSX. (305 Nm). This means 2010 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Acura NSX. 2010 GMC Savana has automatic transmission and 2000 Acura NSX has manual transmission. 2000 Acura NSX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 GMC Savana will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: