2000 Acura NSX vs. 2011 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2011 Ford Ecosport is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Acura NSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Acura NSX would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura NSX (480 HP) has 371 more horse power than 2011 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2000 Acura NSX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Acura NSX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Acura NSX | 2011 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Acura | Ford |
Model | NSX | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 480 HP | 109 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2490 mm |