2000 Acura NSX vs. 2012 Audi RS3
To start off, 2012 Audi RS3 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Acura NSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Acura NSX would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura NSX (480 HP) has 145 more horse power than 2012 Audi RS3. (335 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 2012 Audi RS3.
Because 2012 Audi RS3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Acura NSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Acura NSX (542 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Audi RS3. (450 Nm). This means 2000 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Audi RS3. 2012 Audi RS3 has automatic transmission and 2000 Acura NSX has manual transmission. 2000 Acura NSX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Audi RS3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Acura NSX | 2012 Audi RS3 | |
| Make | Acura | Audi |
| Model | NSX | RS3 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 480 HP | 335 HP |
| Torque | 542 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 7-speed automated manual |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
