2000 Acura NSX vs. 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon
To start off, 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Acura NSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Acura NSX would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura NSX (480 HP) has 396 more horse power than 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon. (84 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon.
Because 2000 Acura NSX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Acura NSX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Acura NSX | 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon | |
Make | Acura | Chrysler |
Model | NSX | Ypsilon |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 480 HP | 84 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2390 mm |