2000 Acura NSX vs. 2012 Jaguar XF

To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Acura NSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Acura NSX would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura NSX (480 HP) has 243 more horse power than 2012 Jaguar XF. (237 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 2012 Jaguar XF.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Acura NSX (542 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Jaguar XF. (500 Nm). This means 2000 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Jaguar XF. 2012 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 2000 Acura NSX has manual transmission. 2000 Acura NSX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Acura NSX 2012 Jaguar XF
Make Acura Jaguar
Model NSX XF
Year Released 2000 2012
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 3500 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 480 HP 237 HP
Torque 542 Nm 500 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed shiftable automatic
Number of Seats 1 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1877 mm
Vehicle Height 1180 mm 1461 mm
Wheelbase Size 2540 mm 2908 mm