2000 Acura RL vs. 1957 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2000 Acura RL is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 3,472 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura RL (205 HP) has 165 more horse power than 1957 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1957 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Acura RL weights approximately 465 kg more than 1957 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Acura RL | 1957 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Acura | Toyota |
| Model | RL | Master RR |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1957 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3472 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 205 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2540 mm |
