2000 Acura RL vs. 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite
To start off, 2000 Acura RL is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 3,472 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Acura RL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Acura RL | 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | |
| Make | Acura | Austin-Healey |
| Model | RL | Sprite |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3472 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 205 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1350 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 27 L |
