2000 Acura RL vs. 1977 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2000 Acura RL is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 3,472 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura RL (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1977 Toyota Mark II. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1977 Toyota Mark II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Acura RL weights approximately 480 kg more than 1977 Toyota Mark II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Acura RL (304 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Toyota Mark II. (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2000 Acura RL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Toyota Mark II.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Acura RL | 1977 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Acura | Toyota |
Model | RL | Mark II |
Year Released | 2000 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3472 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2590 mm |