2000 Acura RL vs. 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfetta
To start off, 2000 Acura RL is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfetta would be higher. At 3,472 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Acura RL weights approximately 475 kg more than 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfetta.
Because 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfetta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfetta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Acura RL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Acura RL | 1983 Alfa Romeo Alfetta | |
Make | Acura | Alfa Romeo |
Model | RL | Alfetta |
Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3472 cc | 2393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2260 mm |