2000 Acura RL vs. 1986 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2000 Acura RL is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 3,472 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura RL (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1986 Mercury Lynx. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1986 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Acura RL weights approximately 650 kg more than 1986 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Acura RL (304 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mercury Lynx. (144 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2000 Acura RL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Acura RL | 1986 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | Acura | Mercury |
Model | RL | Lynx |
Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3472 cc | 1859 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1025 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2400 mm |