2000 Acura RL vs. 1986 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 2000 Acura RL is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 3,472 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Acura RL weights approximately 571 kg more than 1986 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1986 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Acura RL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Acura RL has automatic transmission and 1986 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1986 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Acura RL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Acura RL | 1986 Toyota Lite Ace | |
| Make | Acura | Toyota |
| Model | RL | Lite Ace |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
| Engine Size | 3472 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 205 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1104 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1910 mm |
