2000 Acura RL vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Acura RL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Acura RL would be higher. At 3,472 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura RL (205 HP) has 106 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Acura RL (304 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (130 Nm). This means 2000 Acura RL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Acura RL | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
| Make | Acura | Chevrolet |
| Model | RL | Aveo |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3472 cc | 1398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 205 HP | 99 HP |
| Torque | 304 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4039 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1735 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1516 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2525 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 46 L |
