2000 Acura TL vs. 1967 Citroen 2CV
To start off, 2000 Acura TL is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura TL (226 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1967 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1967 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Acura TL weights approximately 1015 kg more than 1967 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Acura TL | 1967 Citroen 2CV | |
Make | Acura | Citroen |
Model | TL | 2CV |
Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3210 cc | 425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 25 L |