2000 Acura TL vs. 1983 Renault 9
To start off, 2000 Acura TL is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Renault 9 would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura TL (226 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1983 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1983 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Acura TL weights approximately 755 kg more than 1983 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Acura TL | 1983 Renault 9 | |
Make | Acura | Renault |
Model | TL | 9 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3210 cc | 1107 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 38 L |