2000 Acura TL vs. 1999 Nissan XVL
To start off, 2000 Acura TL is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan XVL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan XVL would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura TL (226 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1999 Nissan XVL. (156 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan XVL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Acura TL weights approximately 315 kg more than 1999 Nissan XVL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan XVL (310 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Acura TL. (294 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan XVL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Acura TL.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Acura TL | 1999 Nissan XVL | |
| Make | Acura | Nissan |
| Model | TL | XVL |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3210 cc | 2953 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 226 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 294 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1260 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 80 L |
