2000 Acura TL vs. 2004 Ford E-250
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Acura TL would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura TL (226 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 6150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 795 kg more than 2000 Acura TL.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Acura TL. (294 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Acura TL.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Acura TL | 2004 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Acura | Ford |
Model | TL | E-250 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3210 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 294 Nm | 389 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 2370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 132 L |