2000 Acura TL vs. 2006 BMW 525
To start off, 2006 BMW 525 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura TL (226 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2006 BMW 525. (215 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW 525.
Because 2006 BMW 525 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 525. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Acura TL (294 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW 525. (251 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2000 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW 525.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Acura TL | 2006 BMW 525 | |
Make | Acura | BMW |
Model | TL | 525 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3210 cc | 2999 cc |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 294 Nm | 251 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 70 L |