2000 Acura TL vs. 2007 Ford E-250
To start off, 2007 Ford E-250 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Acura TL would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura TL (226 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2007 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford E-250.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-250 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Acura TL. (294 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2007 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Acura TL.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Acura TL | 2007 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Acura | Ford |
Model | TL | E-250 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2007 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3210 cc | 4604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 294 Nm | 388 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 90 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 132 L |