2000 Acura TL vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura TL (226 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2007 Renault Clio. (197 HP @ 7250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2007 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Acura TL (294 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Renault Clio. (292 Nm @ 5550 RPM). This means 2000 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Renault Clio. 2000 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 2007 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2007 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Acura TL | 2007 Renault Clio | |
Make | Acura | Renault |
Model | TL | Clio |
Year Released | 2000 | 2007 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3210 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7250 RPM |
Torque | 294 Nm | 292 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 93 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1770 mm |