2000 Alfa Romeo 145 vs. 1967 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 2000 Alfa Romeo 145 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Eldorado (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 2000 Alfa Romeo 145. (102 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 2000 Alfa Romeo 145. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 807 kg more than 2000 Alfa Romeo 145. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Alfa Romeo 145 | 1967 Cadillac Eldorado | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 145 | Eldorado |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1369 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 2082 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 5620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 82 L |
