2000 Alfa Romeo 145 vs. 2004 Ford E-150
To start off, 2004 Ford E-150 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Alfa Romeo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Alfa Romeo 145 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2000 Alfa Romeo 145. (102 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2000 Alfa Romeo 145. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-150 weights approximately 852 kg more than 2000 Alfa Romeo 145. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Alfa Romeo 145. (125 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Alfa Romeo 145.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Alfa Romeo 145 | 2004 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 145 | E-150 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1369 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 388 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 2127 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.3 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 132 L |