2000 Alfa Romeo 145 vs. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo
To start off, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Alfa Romeo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Alfa Romeo 145 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (250 HP) has 148 more horse power than 2000 Alfa Romeo 145. (102 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo should accelerate faster than 2000 Alfa Romeo 145. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo weights approximately 515 kg more than 2000 Alfa Romeo 145. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (334 Nm) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Alfa Romeo 145. (125 Nm). This means 2004 Isuzu Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Alfa Romeo 145.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Alfa Romeo 145 | 2004 Isuzu Rodeo | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Isuzu |
Model | 145 | Rodeo |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1369 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 125 Nm | 334 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 64.9 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.3 L/100km | 10.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.7 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 74 L |