2000 Alfa Romeo 146 vs. 1965 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 2000 Alfa Romeo 146 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 2000 Alfa Romeo 146. (102 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2000 Alfa Romeo 146. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 850 kg more than 2000 Alfa Romeo 146. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Alfa Romeo 146 | 1965 Cadillac Calais | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 146 | Calais |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1370 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 2010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 95 L |