2000 Alfa Romeo 147 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Alfa Romeo 147. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Alfa Romeo 147 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 2000 Alfa Romeo 147. (118 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2000 Alfa Romeo 147. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 572 kg more than 2000 Alfa Romeo 147. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Alfa Romeo 147, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Alfa Romeo 147. (146 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Alfa Romeo 147. 2013 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 2000 Alfa Romeo 147 has manual transmission. 2000 Alfa Romeo 147 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Alfa Romeo 147 2013 Cadillac CTS
Make Alfa Romeo Cadillac
Model 147 CTS
Year Released 2000 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1598 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 118 HP 314 HP
Engine RPM 6200 RPM 6800 RPM
Torque 146 Nm 373 Nm
Torque RPM 4200 RPM 4900 RPM
Engine Bore Size 82 mm 94 mm
Engine Stroke Size 75.7 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.3:1 11.3
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1206 kg 1778 kg
Vehicle Length 4180 mm 4859 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1842 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1473 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Consumption 6.3 L/100km 8.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 11.1 L/100km 13 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 8.1 L/100km 11.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 68 L