2000 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1946 Maserati 6C
To start off, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Maserati 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Maserati 6C would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 weights approximately 476 kg more than 1946 Maserati 6C.
Because 1946 Maserati 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Maserati 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1946 Maserati 6C | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Maserati |
Model | 156 | 6C |
Year Released | 2000 | 1946 |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 804 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2560 mm |