2000 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1954 DKW Munga
To start off, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1954 DKW Munga. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 1954 DKW Munga.
Because 1954 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 (260 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 DKW Munga. (71 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1954 DKW Munga | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | DKW |
Model | 156 | Munga |
Year Released | 2000 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 896 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 71 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2010 mm |