2000 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1958 Cadillac Biarritz
To start off, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 190 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 900 kg more than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156.
Because 1958 Cadillac Biarritz is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Cadillac Biarritz. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1958 Cadillac Biarritz | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 156 | Biarritz |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1958 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2492 cc | 5980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 2300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3300 mm |
