2000 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1972 Matra-Simca M670
To start off, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Matra-Simca M670. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Matra-Simca M670 would be higher. At 2,999 cc (12 cylinders), 1972 Matra-Simca M670 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Matra-Simca M670 (444 HP @ 11000 RPM) has 324 more horse power than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. (120 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Matra-Simca M670 should accelerate faster than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 weights approximately 600 kg more than 1972 Matra-Simca M670.
Because 1972 Matra-Simca M670 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Matra-Simca M670. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1972 Matra-Simca M670 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Matra-Simca |
Model | 156 | M670 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1972 |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 444 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 11000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2570 mm |