2000 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1978 Renault Alpine
To start off, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Renault Alpine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Renault Alpine would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Renault Alpine is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Renault Alpine (148 HP) has 28 more horse power than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. (120 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Renault Alpine should accelerate faster than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156.
Because 1978 Renault Alpine is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Renault Alpine. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Renault Alpine (204 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. (144 Nm). This means 1978 Renault Alpine will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1978 Renault Alpine | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Renault |
Model | 156 | Alpine |
Year Released | 2000 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 144 Nm | 204 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 200 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11 seconds | 7 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |