2000 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 weights approximately 510 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 (260 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Zastava |
Model | 156 | 102 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2160 mm |