2000 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 (190 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 weights approximately 600 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 (222 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Zastava |
| Model | 156 | 102 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 222 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2160 mm |
