2000 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1996 Holden XU 6
To start off, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 371 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. (144 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. 1996 Holden XU 6 has automatic transmission and 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 has manual transmission. 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Holden XU 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1996 Holden XU 6 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
Model | 156 | XU 6 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 144 Nm | 515 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |