2000 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 2001 Lancia Nea
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 (188 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lancia Nea weights approximately 65 kg more than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. (226 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. 2001 Lancia Nea has automatic transmission and 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 has manual transmission. 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Lancia Nea will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Alfa Romeo 156 | 2001 Lancia Nea | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Lancia |
Model | 156 | Nea |
Year Released | 2000 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2492 cc | 2445 cc |
Horse Power | 188 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 226 Nm | 314 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 1370 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2590 mm |