2000 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. (155 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 315 kg more than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. (187 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Alfa Romeo 156 2003 Cadillac CTS
Make Alfa Romeo Cadillac
Model 156 CTS
Year Released 2000 2003
Body Type Station Wagon Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1970 cc 2597 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 155 HP 179 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 187 Nm 245 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 3400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 83.3 mm
Engine Stroke Size 91 mm 79.6 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 10.2:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1305 kg 1620 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 4840 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2600 mm 2890 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 64 L