2000 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Astro

To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Astro (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. (143 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 610 kg more than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Chevrolet Astro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Chevrolet Astro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. (172 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Alfa Romeo 156 2004 Chevrolet Astro
Make Alfa Romeo Chevrolet
Model 156 Astro
Year Released 2000 2004
Body Type Station Wagon Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1747 cc 4294 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 143 HP 190 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 172 Nm 339 Nm
Engine Bore Size 82 mm 102.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 82.7 mm 88 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.3:1 9.2:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 8 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1345 kg 1955 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 4830 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1980 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1910 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2630 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 5.9 L/100km 13.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 102 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]