2000 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 2004 Jaguar XK

To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (294 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. (118 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 445 kg more than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (411 Nm) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156. (146 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Alfa Romeo 156.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Alfa Romeo 156 2004 Jaguar XK
Make Alfa Romeo Jaguar
Model 156 XK
Year Released 2000 2004
Body Type Station Wagon Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1597 cc 4195 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 118 HP 294 HP
Engine RPM 6200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 146 Nm 411 Nm
Engine Bore Size 82 mm 86.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 75.6 mm 90 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.3:1 11.0:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1360 kg 1805 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1300 mm
Wheelbase Size 2600 mm 2590 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 5.9 L/100km 11.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 75 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]